This blog is dedicated to exposing and documenting misdeeds and misadventures of departments and employees of the city of Little Rock, Arkansas. [news@snarkymedia.com/ 501-487-1699]
A Snarky Media Group publication
Iniquitous LRPD chief does not believe court orders, regulations, rules or laws apply to him
Russ Racop -01/18/2021
The LRPD chief is scheduled to appear and address an invitation only crowd at Nourish Wellness at 9015 Kanis Road (the old LRFD fire station).
This business is not zoned as an event center and such an event violates city of Little Rock Ordinances.
To hold events such as the one set for today, a Condition Use Permit application would have to be filed with Little Rock Planning and the application would have to be approved by the LR Planning Commission and then by the LR Board of Directors.
No such application for a zoning change has been made the LR Planning Department apprised us last week.
Additionally the Arkansas Department of Health requires such events to be approved by them due to the medical pandemic.
The city business license for Nourish Wellness is in the name of Autumn Causey.
According to court records, Causey also uses the names Autumn Garcia.
Web sources also indicate she also uses several other names.
Causey is employed by the State of Arkansas.
Like LRPD Chief Humphrey, Causey has issues with paying debts.
According to the Arkansas Secretary of State, the registered agent for Nourish Wellness is Latoya Bouldes and she and Tina Gomillion-Wesley are coprorate officers.
Like the LRPD Chief and Causey, Bouldes hassome issues with personal finances.
In addition to the illegal use of the site as an Event Center, it appear that an unlicensed Fitness Center is also operating at the location.
Why is the LRPD chief associating with these sketchy folks?
LRPD mouthpiece Mark Nelson a/k/a Mark Edwards - Ill suited for public employment?
On December 11, 2020, KATV reporter Shelby Rose sent iniquitous LRPD chief Humphrey an email requesting an interview.
Instead of receiving a response from the chief or his assistant saying okay and setting up a time, Rose got a terse denial of access to the chief from Nelson/Edwards.
That denial is in direct conflict with information LRPD has on their city website and most all emails that are sent out from the department.
Undaunted, Rose responded and again requested the perhaps Nelson/Edwards himself could be interviewed.
As you can see, Nelson/Edwards said no. So much for their #copaganda posted on their webpage.
By coincidence, I happened to be at LRPD HQ on December 11, 2020. I was there picking up a FOI response.
When I arrived I observed a KATV vehicle parked in front of LRPD HQ, and when I was granted access to the building, I observed a female reporter and a male cameraman.
They were in the front lobby.
I walked past them to walk down the hall to go to the records counter around the corner.
While waiting to be handed the records I requested, I heard a commotion and started recording.
The video shows Nelson/Edwards and a KATV cameraman going back toward the chief's conference room. The female reporter was not with them. The cameraman has a worried look on his face.
Yes that's a moldy hole in the ceiling
After I was provided with the records I requested, I left the building. Just outside of the entrance, I observed the female KATV reporter. She was talking on her cellphone and appeared very distraught.
I can't say for sure that it was Rose as she had a mask on and to the best of my knowledge I've never met her.
The LRPD chief was featured on several newscasts that evening taking about the violent crime in the city. The delusional chief made the comment that "Little Rock isn't dangerous."
Then a few days later KATV was still trying to get an interview with the chief, Nelson/Edwards or any warn body from LRPD.
Notice that Nelson/Edwards is still avoiding giving KATV an interview and mentions that Rose made a complaint against him.
We sent a FOI request to LRPD asking for video from their CCTV system and any complaints filed about Edwards.
LRPD refused to provide the video from their CCTV system showing me, the KATV folks and Edwards as well as the complaint Rose made about hi.
One thing is certain, Little Rock is a very dangerous place and the chief and Edwards are not fit for their positions.
###
When Nelson/Edwards was hired the chief let him know I was a problem for him. Edwards contacted a mutual friend in law enforcement. That friend told him I was good at my job and would expose anyone that was doing wrong and with the receipts.
Well Nelson/Edwards, what he told you was 100% correct.
You might be wondering why we are referring to him as Nelson/Edward's, well apparently his real last name is Nelson and his alter ego/fake name is Edwards.
###
KATV has been posting about all the violent crimes on social media. They also tried to get records about the lying Brady Cops in the LRPD ranks and were told no records exist.
We posted a list from records obtained from LRPD. That list is available here and here.
Jimmy F. Brooks, Jr. - LRPD's Crime Analyst Supervisor
Russ Racop - December 14, 2020
Apparently LRPD's chief crime analyst is a liar.
In an email Brook sent to Laura Martin (LRPD's Communication and Community Relations Manager) in October, Brooks made some shocking statements.
✦ Gunfire is "regular background noise' in some areas of the city.
✦ Citizen's make false "shots fired" calls to get a quicker response from LRPD.
✦ The expensive ShotSpotter gunfire detection system is a fail.
Brooks' claims about the false calls to police about hearing gunshots to obtain a faster response time from LRPD caused us to send a Freedom of Information request to LRPD for records and data to back up his assertion.
No surprise to us, LRPD could not produce a single record or any data to substantiate Brooks statements in the October email exchange with Martin.
LRPD has policies about truthfulness for sworn and civilian personnel. They also have one about employee actions, on or off duty, that paint the department in a bad light.
Brooks' remarks about gunfire being "normal background noise" in some areas smacks of racism.
Brooks' untruthful statements call his and the LRPD's credibility into question.
Brook's needs to be demoted or fired.
Back in 2017 Brooks wrote a story about transparency in law enforcement. You can view it by clicking here.
In that article Brooks relates frustration he had when he was a reporter and had issues with transparency with LRPD. He also mentions "openness". Honesty and credibility are factors in "openness". It's also apparent that Brooks' lacks those.
What about the ShotSpotter fail? That will be discussed in another post.
Until then take a look at this video about ShotSpotter.
At-large city director Joan Adcock is well-known for her opposition of actions to remove racist social constructs in the city
Emails obtained via the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act reveal that long in the tooth at-large city director Joan Adcock once again has targeted a minority individual and spared no efforts to harass them.
Back in 2013, The Arkansas Times had several stories about Adcock going after minority owned food trucks.
➖➖➖
My attention was called by someone who was there to the waning minutes of the Little Rock Board of Directors meeting Tuesday, when Director Ken Richardson took the mike to ask for a reminder for the board about a policy directive concerning contact between directors and city departments. Directors, in theory, are supposed to work through the city manager or department heads, not directly with staff members, and not micromanage city government. Policy making, not management, is the ideal. But, said Richardson, he’d been contacted recently by food cart vendors in his ward who said they’d been “repeatedly targeted” for inspections or observation by the city and he suspected another member of the board was responsible. “Every time they’re inspected they get a clean bill of health,” Richardson said. But he added that the vendors, all Latinos, said they were beginning to feel “some form of discrimination” was at work. “I’d like to look at this before it becomes a serious liability for us.” I talked further about this Thursday with Richardson, who declined to identify specific complainants. They fear retaliation, he said. I asked City Manager Bruce Moore for a record of requests on taco truck inspections. He later provided a three-year list of violations by traveling food vendors that showed only two in 2013, neither for a Latino vendor. I haven’t heard back from Moore, however, on my followup question: whether there was a record on the specific complaint Richardson made — multiple visits to vendors who were NOT guilty of any rule violations. Richardson said he couldn’t say where the complaints have originated. Since he suspected a city director is responsible for inspection requests, I turned first to at-large Director Joan Adcock. Adcock is known for aggressive involvement in City Hall business. She rose to political power from Southwest Little Rock, a big chunk of which Richardson now represents and home to many taco trucks and wagons. She once was an opponent of a Latino nightclub in the rapidly changing neighborhood, now heavily minority after beginnings as a working class white community. She is not particularly noted for sympathy on minority issues. She was a student at Central High during the 1957 school crisis and has been cool to events commemorating that episode, including a symbolic city board repeal of a pro-segregation resolution approved by the city board more than 50 years ago. I sent Adcock questions and left her a phone message. Late last night, I got an e-mail response that said, “Sorry I am so late it has been a very busy day. I am not the person you are looking for.” Richardson said the person responsible is less important than the action itself. Sure, city directors have broad portfolio — and a 1st Amendment right — to go to anyone in city government with a complaint about a city business. But, said Richardson, special requests for city inspections “create confusion for staff, add workload and are ridiculous,” he said. More broadly, he said that the message of the repeat visits is, “You’re not welcome here, even if you’re playing by the rules.” Richardson, himself a graduate and former student body president at Central High, says the city regularly observes anniversaries of the triumph of the rule of law in Little Rock in the school crisis. “We talk about how far we’ve come. These kinds of actions are a stark reminder that we might have farther to go to move our city to a level we want to move.” He said city pressure on Latino vendors comes as the city school district deals with allegations that it has been insensitive to bullying of Latino students. “I don’t want that same kind of activity or perception from city government,” he said. Richardson and I agree on a purely personal level about the gravity of equal treatment of taco trucks. He says he likes them as much as I do. For illustration, I’ve used one of our file photos of my favorite taco wagon, Taqueria Samantha, which sets up on Geyer Springs Road in Richardson’s ward. He tells me that it’s his favorite, too. (Steak quesadilla for him; carnitas burrito for me.) He said he’d checked with Samantha’s operator and it has not been a target of recent inspections. But he said the advent of warmer weather and more activity at the food carts seemed to have spurred the scrutiny. “Specific targeting of Hispanic food vendors is a bad practice,” Richardson said. “I don’t want us to get in the bad habit of — or being perceived as — practicing discrimination.” UPDATE: Director Adcock responded further to a followup question I posed after receiving her brief response last night. She says she HAS gotten involved in vendor issues in the past, though not recently. ➖➖➖
Records we obtained from the city of Little Rock and the Arkansas Department of Health reveal Adcock is still using her position to harass minority citizens.
The Health Department apparently sent uncertified letters to the Good Samaritan's place of Business which did not have a mailbox.
Photos provided by the Department of Health clearly show the business is located behind a tall locked security fence with no open access to the public or the mailman.
The Health Department attempted to stage an entrapment operation, but never caught the Good Samaritan in the act or selling food from her apartment or any other location.
Director Adcock corralled the Fire Department, Code Enforcement and Water Reclamation Authority to assist her in her harassment of the Good Samaritan.
An email from the Water Reclamation Authority substantiates our assertion that the Good Samaritan never received those uncertified cease and desist letters.
The Water Reclamation email also details that the Good Samaritan was trying to feed and help folks.
We have reached out to several city department for additional records and responses to questions. Stay tuned for part 2.
